Custom Search

I'll start off my stating that it is my view and belief that the Multiverse Theory is in fact true, but not on the level that it discussed, detailed and written about by scientists and other "professionals". My view is that the Multiverse is like a woven canvas that has been folded infinite times and is in fact infinite in size. Each thread in the canvas is a parallel universe. My theory is not just centered around the Multiverse but around the elements that are key pieces of the Multiverse, such as my own theories based around Deja Vu, Creativity, Belief and Religion.

Let's take a look at Deja Vu. My view is that subconciously, like when we are sleeping, our mind is able to glimpse these parallel universes, in some of these parallel universes events happen sooner then in our own universe resulting in the feeling of Deja Vu. However, to expand on this I believe that some of these parallel universes closely resemble our own with minor differences and it is these close resembling universes that we are able to subconciously link with(within the field of Deja Vu that is). It is my idea/theory that Deja Vu works as a subconcious warning system. At times we see what is happening with a strong sense of Deja Vu where we are absolutely positive such an event has already occured. In theory the idea is we knew what the other outcome(s) would've been but we chose the current path for a reason and our concious mind blocks out those memories/possibilities that were viewed through the subconcious parallel universe link in order to spare our own mind from mental trauma(the idea is that too much knowledge could damage your own mind).

Another idea to throw out there is that the other universes that closely resemble our own are just as infinite as the multiverse. Something as small as you could be looking left at any particular moment in one universe and just that one movement alone would be the difference between infinite other universes where you were looking right, straight ahead, reading, writing or any number of other activities. Now you take those possibilities that pertain just to yourself and add in other people with their minor differences. You end up with an exponential increase of parallel universes for each person and change that has taken place till you are literally at an infinite number of parallel universes where every single solitairy change is reflected within one universe or another. Believe me, I know this is a lot to grasp and get your head around. However, this is but the beginning.

The next stage is the combination of belief and religion. As obviously noted and reiterated here, it is my belief that this infinite multiverse theory is real. It cannot be proven right nor can it be proven wrong, just like religion(nothing more then a belief). I will say that in certain universes that any given religion has the possibility of being proven true as this falls into the category and theory that every single solitairy change and possibility is reflected in one universe or another. Take note though that I'm talking about this in other universes, not our own. For our universe I don't believe in any religion because there are too many, so who's to say which religion is right? That's just one part of the answer though. My view on religion as a whole is it is nothing but a "belief" and "guidance" system. The general population are like sheep, they follow the leader and want something to believe in so they follow blindly, thus resulting in the guidance portion. These people then pass on this "brainwashing"/teachings to their children and friends. The concept is it's easier to follow others rather than think for yourself. I'm not really a fan of attacking religion's blindly or attacking them at all for that matter because everyone has the right to believe what they want. In order to nail my point down I must regretfully attack perhaps the most popular religion of all: Christianity. Take heed to the timeline analysis. Christianity was in fact an "upstart" religion. So are you trying to tell me to "believe" in your so called teachings over that of ancient religions that existed far longer then the belief in the single entity known as "God"? What are you to tell me what to believe in? The whole thing behind Christianity in my view is to try to get more "sheep". I happen to know people that are religious and most of them are smart enough to not try to persuade me to their "side" but there have been others that have tried which I find rather annoying. You have no legit proof of your religion, the bible itself is not proof. As far as I'm concerned the bible was nothing more then a story written by some drunk monks that got together and decided to write a story in order to kill some time and then some fanatic took the stories seriously, started a cult which grew into a "religion". Enough of that talk, as you can see religion is one of the things that annoy me.

Aside from the layers upon layers of parallel universes that govern Deja Vu, it is my belief we also have layers of parallel universes that closely tie to our own individual subconcious mind for governing our creativity(layers outside the inner Deja Vu layers). My belief is that our dreams and subconcious mind links us and allows us to glimpse parallel universes and retain some of what we saw. It is for this reason of why I believe we have so many religions in the world. As I mentioned already, I do not believe in religion in our world but I do believe that people have "glimpsed" and brought that knowledge to our world through subconcious dreams/thoughts. The same scenario plays for creativity, I believe "nothing" is ever new or unique. I believe for the most part it was thought of, done, created or whatever in another parallel universe or universes before someone here subconciously linked and decided to bring it(whatever IT is/was) here. Don't get me wrong, to a certain extent I believe our universe has had its own original creative moments but think of it like a giant circle, in one or several of the parallel universes the THOUGHT of a said idea/creation existed while in another parallel universe that thought was materialised into reality. It's a form of balance, we feed off of each parallel for the sake of progress and to establish individuality. Why such a vast thought process? Take a close look at some of the more well known "fictional" stories, books, games, movies and other forms of entertainment(it really doesn't matter which well known book, game, movie or whatever you wish to use as an example. Some of personal preferences would be to take the Wheel of Time books, Harry Potter, Star Wars, and the Final Fantasy series). The story, character creation, design, bonds that are established, behaviour patterns and so on are so detailed that you can find yourself believing the story to be true. It is my belief that these stories are in fact real and have taken place in another parallel universe, the story was brought to us as nothing more then "creativity" from the mind of someone who subconciously linked to that particular universe. It is also logical under such a belief that people or events from our universe are nothing but fictional in some of the parallel worlds, afterall the idea itself is for every single solitairy possibility to exist in one form or another in the parallel universes.

Another expanded idea I have thought about which ties in with the whole multiverse theory is that we are the central thread in the woven canvas. We are the balanced chaos of all parallel universes. We don't follow just one guidance/religious system or another, instead each individual has the ability to freely choose what to believe and what not to believe in thus establishing the main building block in our ever changing chaotic universe. A side view is that as the central thread of balanced chaos there is no right or wrong, we have no true absolutes as where other parallel universes will no doubt live out the extremes of right and wrong as it pertains to religion, law, and other forms of order. One of the key factors to support this line of thought and theory is that we still exist, we haven't gone down the path of utter chaos and mindless destruction, and our universe hasn't folded in on itself after all this time. Instead we have a balance that is achieved through acceptance and tolerance. A good example to bring up would be to take a war and change the outcome then try to predict how the world would be today. You'll notice that in every war fought that if the other side won then we would be living in an extreme thus changing our balance to one side over the other removing the neutrality that is the central thread. Here is an extreme example. If Hitler and the Nazi's won then our world as we know it would've pratically been extinct because of Hitler's insanity with his 'purity' idea of the blonde haired, blue eyed humans being supreme. Think of it this way, if Hitler won he wouldn't of just stopped at that continent. He would've done everything in his power to elminate and reshape the rest of the world as he saw fit and thus most of us wouldn't be in existence today. That kind of world would've ended bad and probably would've folded on itself. It is that kind of thought process that I use to support my idea that we are the central thread as not only do we still exist after all this time but we have never truly hit one extreme over the other. True that there is good and evil in our universe but we don't actually lean towards one side more then the other and that is where the idea of balanced chaos came from.

The last major part to tackle is a summary of sorts and I also feel I should tie myself into this. The sheer size of this multiverse theory with the elements of Deja Vu, Belief, Religion, Creativity and the subconcious mind is so much for the average mind to handle that most people won't even read this completely through and many won't beable to get their heads around the concept(some of them out fear because such a large view would make them feel small and insignificant as where others will reject the view because of religious or other beliefs of their own). The part that ties to myself is I label myself as being instable which in my view is better then having someone judge you and in my case with such a strange view on the universe the average person will think of me as "insane". The reasoning for bringing this to the forefront is partially my own insecurity at being questioned and the other part is with such a large scaled theory I can look at myself from a distance and come to the conclusion that a person that could come up with something so indepth like this has some mental issues, specifically social issues(which is rather true considering I am anti-social and would rather write then talk). We'll follow this up with I have some analogies and a challenge for your minds, "Once upon a time gravity was just a hunch", electricity didn't exist, flying was thought to be "impossible", travelling to the moon was nothing but a dream. Can you prove my multiverse theory to be true or false with real evidence? You see, this is my opinion and as an opinion if you don't agree with it then you can simply forget what you've read, if you're one of the argumentive nay sayers then I don't want to hear your opinion as it doesn't matter to me(your closed mind is worthless to me). It is my view that religion is nothing more than a belief and guidance system, so why shouldn't this multiverse theory be the same? One of the hidden lessons behind all this is to think for yourself, stop being a follower/sheep, open your mind to the endless possibilities/parallel worlds that can neither be proven to or not to exist.

Another follow up on the instability portion also ties to my overall thought process of dealing in "scenarios". One of the skills I have developed over the years is to take any given situation and to change the outcome in my head, from looking at the extremes to the variations and everything in between as fast as I possbily can. Why? the simple answer is to try to see how other people think and to gain the ability to be openly objective of yourself and your own actions in as unbiased of a way as possible(eliminating an ego and taking on as much of a neutral stance as possible). This kind of thought process is quite possibly the main reason of why my multiverse theory incorporates so many elements(I think on such a detailed level when I think through scenarios that minor elements come into play). Somewhere along the lines I went from simple scenarios to vast thoughts, but the real kicker here is the obvious effect on my sanity. I do question myself all the time and as already noted, I have labeled myself to be instable. It just keeps getting better, I could take my own multiverse theory here and find all the "holes" and fill them in but it is my belief that very few people will beable to follow the vastness of such a theory as it stands. The other portion to this is that if I continue on such an immense path of explaining my thoughts and theories will I eventually lose myself? Was it or is it my fate, destiny, mission or whatever you wish to call it to give this kind of indepth view for the world to see? So many questions still exist and the only answers I have and can give is to reach further down and fill in the holes of the multiverse and any other ideas/writings that I do but the cost is my own humanity. What do I mean by losing my humanity? As it stands, I live like a hermit, I don't have many friends as it is my preference to keep to myself and as such the only people I come into contact with on a regular basis is my parents. Essentially you could look at it as I'm punishing myself, as it has been my choice to stay away from other human interaction. The plus and at the same time negative side is that while I continue on the path of being an anti-social loner you get to see the immensity of my thought process in written detail as I will continue writing when I have the chance.